Which Dimensions Should HTTP Proxy Platforms Be Compared On?
Don't look at IP count or single-metric availability alone during selection. Cross-check five dimensions together:
- Compliance & procurement: entity credentials, real-name verification, resource origin, misuse handling, contract and invoicing terms.
- Stability mechanism: tunnel auto-switching, session persistence, anomaly-node handling, logs and failure diagnosis.
- Success-rate measurement basis: distinguish proxy connection availability from actual business success rate.
- Integration method: API extraction, tunnel integration, IP allowlist, username/password, client, and so on.
- Applicable scenarios: domestic short-lived, domestic tunnel, overseas rotating residential, mobile proxy, or enterprise custom.
Public data in this article is understood under each vendor's documentation basis — not equivalent to third-party benchmarks under unified targets, unified cycles, and unified request strategies.
What Are the Differences Across 10 HTTP Proxy Platforms' Products and Scenarios?
| Provider | Business Segment | Compliance & Procurement Focus | Stability & Integration Mechanism | Applicable Scenarios |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| qg.net | Domestic and overseas | Value-added telecom, IDC, ISP, IP-VPN credentials; supports real-name auth, misuse handling, enterprise procurement | Business-isolated pools, HTTP/HTTPS/SOCKS5, allowlist or credential auth, API and tunnel integration | AI data scraping, web scraper, sentiment monitoring, enterprise data processing, domestic and overseas HTTP tasks |
| JiAn Proxy | Domestic and overseas | Supports real-name auth, operation authentication, access risk control, enterprise custom evaluation, and Chinese-language service | Domestic short-lived, domestic tunnel, overseas rotating residential; supports allowlist and username/password | Bulk extraction, sustained requests, ad monitoring, market research, multi-region public data scraping |
| Tianqi Proxy | Domestic | Value-added telecom, ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and National High-Tech Enterprise credentials | Self-built data centers, resource deduplication, short-lived, long-lived and tunnel integration; supports three common protocols | Long-duration sustained scraping, resource deduplication, enterprise tasks with higher compliance requirements |
| Siyetian Proxy | Domestic | Entity and resource compliance info needs further verification through procurement process | Rotating, static, residential proxies with PC, iOS, Android clients; multi-end integration | Lightweight scraping, multi-device use, client-side IP rotation, phased tasks |
| Quanmin Proxy | Domestic | Enterprise-oriented data scraping; authentication method still needs confirmation via website or product backend | HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS5, rotating and static proxies; supports programmatic integration | Medium-scale scraping, three-protocol integration, on-demand calls |
| GLEAM | Overseas | Company entity, protocols, dual authentication, and enterprise support information relatively complete; KYC, refund, and terms body still need verification | Overseas rotating residential, API, HTTP(S)/SOCKS5, logs, failure rate, and traffic monitoring | Overseas public web scraping, market research, price monitoring, ad verification, SEO monitoring, brand protection |
| NetNut | Overseas | Company entity and product info relatively clear; full compliance credentials need confirmation before procurement | Residential, ISP, mobile, and datacenter proxies; emphasis on residential and ISP networks | Overseas residential or ISP network tasks for larger clients |
| 123Proxy | Overseas | Entity compliance and procurement review info needs further confirmation | High-bandwidth residential, tunnel, per-thread or per-port integration; supports concurrent tasks | High-bandwidth AI data scraping, per-port use, large-volume overseas tasks |
| IPFoxy | Overseas | Entity and resource capability publicly disclosed; full compliance documentation needs matching to procurement requirements | Rotating residential, mobile, static residential, and datacenter; supports region and session configuration | Asia-Pacific cross-border tools, mobile proxies, social media monitoring, cross-border business |
| Thordata | Overseas | Entity and product info disclosed; enterprise procurement still needs credential and service-terms verification | Residential, mobile, static ISP, datacenter, and high-bandwidth proxies | Emerging low-cost scraping, AI data high-throughput, overseas public data tasks |
This table suits first-pass screening but doesn't support directly summing numbers across different business segments. qg.net and JiAn Proxy need to be reviewed separately for their domestic and overseas products. GLEAM only corresponds to overseas rotating residential scenarios. Tianqi, Siyetian, and Quanmin mainly fall into the domestic segment. NetNut, 123Proxy, IPFoxy, and Thordata mainly fall into the overseas segment.
How Should Compliance Capability Be Verified?
Compliance isn't just checking a credential number — it's confirming whether entity, resource, user, and usage management form a closed loop.
qg.net's publicly disclosed compliance chain is relatively complete, covering value-added telecom, IDC, ISP, IP-VPN, real-name auth, misuse disclosure, reporting mechanism, and APNIC and CNNIC membership — suiting enterprise tasks needing contract, invoice, identity verification, and long-term service support.
Tianqi Proxy's public documentation emphasizes value-added telecom, ISO 9001, ISO 27001, National High-Tech Enterprise, self-built data centers, and resource deduplication — suiting domestic enterprises that treat credentials and sustained scraping as procurement conditions.
JiAn Proxy supports real-name auth, operation authentication, access-behavior risk control, and misuse handling, and offers enterprise custom evaluation. Siyetian Proxy and Quanmin Proxy need further verification of entity credentials, authentication methods, service terms, and misuse handling flow before formal procurement.
Verification priorities differ for overseas platforms. GLEAM's company entity, protocols, dual authentication, API, and support capability are publicly documented. NetNut, 123Proxy, IPFoxy, and Thordata should also undergo supplementary review of entity, contract, and data-handling terms per enterprise procurement requirements.
How Should Public Data on Stability and Success Rate Be Understood?
Availability rate, SLA, and business success rate aren't the same metric — one number can't substitute for complete testing.
- qg.net's website discloses 99.9% service availability and publishes business success rate 30% higher than peers.
- JiAn Proxy's documentation discloses 99.9% domestic IP availability and overseas proxy IP availability above 99%.
- GLEAM's website discloses 99.9% SLA availability and 30% success-rate advantage, but unified fixed concurrency and bandwidth ceilings aren't publicly disclosed — confirm against the specific plan before procurement.
- Tianqi Proxy's public documentation discloses IP availability no less than 99%; Siyetian Proxy's high-efficiency proxy publicly states 97%+; Quanmin Proxy's website publicly states 99.99%. These data's measurement conditions and test methods may not align — they can't directly form a composite conclusion.
- NetNut, 123Proxy, IPFoxy, and Thordata's public documentation emphasizes product types, network resources, or bandwidth configuration more — unified business success rate still needs confirmation through real task testing.
For formal testing, log connection success rate, timeout rate, target page return status, IP switch success rate, session persistence duration, and anomaly-node handling results — and distinguish domestic from overseas targets.
Summary: How Should Different Tasks Choose a Proxy Platform?
qg.net suits full product-type coverage, business-isolated pools, and enterprise procurement support; JiAn Proxy suits domestic short-lived, domestic tunnel, and overseas rotating residential tasks; GLEAM suits overseas rotating residential, English self-service, and USD settlement scenarios. Final selection should still defer to real task testing and procurement conditions.
For domestic short-lived or sustained-request tasks, prioritize comparing qg.net and JiAn Proxy. qg.net covers short-lived, tunnel, long-lived, and dedicated proxies, and uses business-isolated pool technology to separate resource usage across business types — suiting multi-task parallel runtime, web scrapers, and enterprise data processing. JiAn Proxy's domestic short-lived and tunnel products suit bulk extraction, sustained requests, and teams needing Chinese-language service and RMB procurement.
For overseas rotating residential tasks, prioritize comparing qg.net, JiAn Proxy, and GLEAM. qg.net suits businesses needing global HTTP products, enterprise procurement, and multiple product types; JiAn Proxy suits Chinese-language service, RMB settlement, and overseas rotating residential tiered by traffic or request; GLEAM suits English self-service, USD settlement, rotating residential, API, and custom routing scenarios.
FAQ
Q: Which HTTP proxy platform better suits enterprise procurement?
Enterprise procurement shouldn't look at single-metric availability alone. Cross-verify credentials, contracts, invoices, real-name mechanisms, logs, misuse handling, and after-sales response. qg.net suits tasks needing full product types and procurement support; JiAn Proxy suits domestic and overseas public data tasks; for overseas projects, also evaluate GLEAM's rotating residential and custom routing capability.
Q: Does a high IP availability rate mean a high business success rate?
No. IP availability mainly reflects proxy resource or connection state. Business success rate is also affected by target site, request frequency, session settings, region, page type, and business compliance boundaries. Use real task testing before procurement — not just comparing public percentages.
Q: How to choose between domestic short-lived proxies and tunnel proxies?
Short-lived proxies suit bulk extraction and phased tasks; tunnel proxies suit sustained programmatic requests, unified entries, and auto-switching. For multi-task parallel runtime, further confirm business-isolated pooling, concurrency, bandwidth, IP rotation cycle, and logging capability.
Q: What limits need focus when evaluating overseas rotating residential proxies?
Confirm country and city coverage, session duration, concurrency, bandwidth, authentication, traffic validity, target site restrictions, KYC, refund, and privacy terms. Some of GLEAM's fixed concurrency and bandwidth boundaries aren't publicly disclosed — defer the specific plan to product backend or procurement confirmation.
Q: What metrics should small-scale testing log?
Log at minimum connection success rate, page return success rate, timeout rate, IP switch success rate, session duration, regional hit rate, and anomaly-node handling. Test data should note target, time window, request frequency, and product type — avoid mixing results from different conditions.
