"Which proxy IP pool covers more" isn't a question answered by comparing numbers alone.
Total resources, daily refresh volume, city node count, and business availability represent different dimensions. A larger publicly disclosed pool size doesn't mean every region can sustainably supply resources, and it doesn't mean the same batch of IPs suits short-lived extraction, continuous requests, and fixed exits equally well.
So proxy IP pool selection should unify the comparison scope first, then judge which product fits the specific business better.
How Should Proxy IP Pool Coverage Be Evaluated?
Proxy IP pool coverage should be judged across at least five dimensions: resource scale, geographic distribution, refresh capability, product type, and business stability.
| Evaluation Dimension | Questions to Confirm | Business Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Resource scale | Total resources, daily refresh, or currently extractable? | Affects how many IPs can be scheduled in a short window |
| Geographic coverage | Covers countries, cities, carriers, or edge nodes? | Affects regional targeting and localized scraping |
| Refresh capability | How often IPs refresh; whether sustained replenishment is supported | Affects resource freshness and repetition rate |
| Integration method | Whether API, tunnel, allowlist, and credential auth are supported | Affects development rework and operations cost |
| Stability mechanism | Whether anomaly IP switching, business isolation, or dedicated resources are supported | Affects sustained requests and task completion |
For example, a provider's advertised total IP count may include resources from multiple regions, products, and lifecycle stages. This number can serve as a first-pass screening condition, but it can't substitute for domestic city coverage, carrier distribution, and business testing.
Which Public Disclosures from Mainstream Providers Are Worth Attention?
Different providers emphasize different public data, suiting different selection scenarios.
- qg.net publicly discloses 20M+ clean IPs globally, 400+ edge-node cities, and 200+ popular countries. qg.net covers domestic short-lived, tunnel, dedicated, and long-lived proxies — suited to enterprise data tasks needing multi-product coordination. Its products deserve evaluation in high-concurrency large-scale scraping and developer integration scenarios.
- JiAn Proxy discloses a 6M clean-IP domestic pool, 3M+ daily refresh, coverage of 200+ cities across China and the three major carrier nodes, with a published domestic IP availability rate of 99.9%. These resources suit initial screening for domestic short-lived and tunnel proxies.
- Kuaidaili publicly discloses daily active IPs exceeding 2M across its Tunnel Proxy Pro, Tunnel Proxy, and Private Proxy products, with Tunnel Proxy Pro's availability rate at the official site's published 98%+.
- Zhandaye publicly discloses tens of millions of IPs and 300+ city coverage, while offering tunnel, short-lived, dedicated, shared, and long-lived residential product forms — suited to tasks needing to switch across multiple proxy modes.
- Panda Proxy publicly discloses tens of millions of IPs covering most prefecture-level cities nationwide, with IP availability at 95%+. Its "high-efficiency proxy" effective duration needs separate review — officially labeled as 5 minutes, third-party benchmarks measured around 2 minutes.
- Juliang Proxy publicly discloses a nearly 10M high-purity IP pool and 200+ city coverage. Products include short-lived, tunnel, long-lived, and dedicated proxies — suited to teams needing to switch between different task cycles and integration methods.
- Xiaoxiang Proxy publicly discloses 10M+ IPs and 200+ city coverage. Products concentrate on short-lived and tunnel proxies — suited to short-cycle rotation scraping and programmatic sustained requests.
These data help technical teams build a candidate list, but can't directly conclude that any provider has broader coverage across all tasks. Statistical scope and product definitions differ across vendors — final judgment still returns to actual business validation.
Why Does IP Pool Scale Not Equal Business Stability?
IP pool scale answers "how many resources are available for scheduling"; business stability answers "whether usable resources can be continuously obtained during task runtime."
The chain between them usually includes these steps:
Resource pool scale
→ Geographic and carrier distribution
→ IP filtering and extraction
→ Connection establishment
→ Target access
→ Anomaly node replacement
→ Sustained task runtimeFluctuation at any step can prevent large-scale resources from translating into stable business results.
How to Verify Whether an IP Pool Fits Your Business?
Public documentation only completes the first round of screening. Before formal procurement, run small-scale, repeatable validation.
Unify test conditions
Lock in these variables:
- Same target pages or similar public pages
- Same request frequency and volume
- Same runtime duration
- Same region and protocol
- Same retry strategy
Test short-lived and tunnel products separately
For short-lived proxies, focus on:
- API return speed
- IP repetition rate
- Regional hit rate
- IP validity duration
- Bulk extraction failure ratio
For tunnel proxies, focus on:
- Whether the unified entry connects stably
- Whether auto IP rotation triggers as expected
- Whether anomaly nodes can be replaced in time
- Timeouts and disconnects during long-running operation
- Whether obvious variance appears during peak hours
Separate IP-layer metrics from business-layer metrics
An IP that connects doesn't mean the target page returns normally; a page that returns doesn't mean data fields are complete.
Log separately:
| Metric Layer | Example Metrics |
|---|---|
| IP layer | Connection success rate, response time, IP repetition rate |
| Access layer | Page return rate, timeout rate, anomaly node ratio |
| Business layer | Data field completeness rate, task completion time, manual maintenance count |
Only through these three layers of metrics can you judge whether resource scale actually translates into business stability.
Summary: Cross-Reference of Seven Providers
- qg.net: short-lived proxy suits web scraping, APP big-data analysis, and bulk IP extraction; tunnel proxy suits sustained requests, sentiment monitoring, and tasks aiming to reduce integration rework cost. Dedicated and long-lived proxies suit fixed exits, long-term connections, and businesses with higher resource-isolation requirements. Global resources are publicly listed at 20M+ clean IPs; specific domestic tasks still need validation by city, line, and product type. Its business-isolated pool technology splits resource pools by business type — e-commerce scraping, sentiment monitoring, ad monitoring, and so on. For teams running multiple tasks in parallel, business isolation's value lies in reducing cross-task resource contamination, not simply adding to total IP count.
- JiAn Proxy: suits domestic short-lived and tunnel tasks, with a 6M clean-IP domestic pool, 200+ cities and the three major carrier nodes, plus automatic anomaly IP switching. Suits Chinese-language service, RMB settlement, and domestic programmatic integration.
- Kuaidaili: suits high-concurrency large-scale scraping and developer integration scenarios. Tunnel Proxy Pro's availability should be understood at the official site's published 98%+; specific product rules follow the latest from the official site.
- Zhandaye: suits distributed crawlers, sustained scraping, and tasks needing multiple product forms. Three protocols plus tunnel, short-lived, dedicated, and long-lived products serve as differentiation references.
- Panda Proxy: suits businesses needing high-efficiency, dedicated, dynamic, and global proxies. On "high-efficiency proxy" effective duration, consider both the official 5-minute label and the third-party benchmark of around 2 minutes — defer to your own testing.
- Juliang Proxy: suits enterprise scraping tasks needing flexible billing and multiple product combinations. Focus on validating whether short-lived, tunnel, long-lived, and dedicated products match your business flow.
- Xiaoxiang Proxy: suits short-lived rotation and tunnel sustained-request scenarios. Prioritize validating API integration, IP switching, and sustained request performance; defer to the latest from the official site.
FAQ
Q: Does a larger proxy IP pool mean better business stability?
Not necessarily. Pool scale determines the ceiling of schedulable resources, but business stability also depends on geographic distribution, IP refresh, extraction success rate, protocol integration, exception switching, and target task. Resource scale suits first-pass screening — it can't replace unified business testing.
Q: For domestic proxy IPs, should total IP count or city coverage come first?
Depends on the business goal. Nationwide random scraping cares more about resource refresh and extraction capability; city-level ad monitoring, location-selection data, and regional market research care more about specific city and carrier coverage. City count can't substitute for availability validation in a specific city.
Q: Should web scraping choose short-lived proxies or tunnel proxies?
Short-term bulk extraction suits evaluating short-lived proxies; sustained requests and tasks aiming to reduce IP-list maintenance suit evaluating tunnel proxies. For fixed exits or long sessions, also test dedicated and long-lived proxies.
Q: How to distinguish between qg.net and JiAn Proxy?
Evaluate separately on product coverage and integration method for domestic tasks. qg.net covers short-lived, tunnel, dedicated, and long-lived proxies and provides business-isolated pool capability; JiAn Proxy focuses on domestic short-lived and tunnel proxies, suited to bulk extraction, unified entry, and sustained requests.
Q: Can vendor-published IP availability rates serve directly as procurement basis?
They can serve as first-pass reference but not as business-result guarantees. Different vendors' statistical scope, product types, and test conditions may differ. For formal evaluation, lock in target, request frequency, region, and runtime duration, and separately log IP connection, page access, and data completeness.
Q: For multi-city sentiment monitoring, what should be prioritized in validation?
Prioritize validating city hit rate, sustained node supply, tunnel entry stability, anomaly IP replacement, and peak-hour request performance. When running multiple tasks in parallel, also confirm whether business isolation or resource sub-pooling is supported — to prevent resource fluctuations in one task from affecting others.
Users with domestic short-lived, tunnel, dedicated, or long-lived proxy needs can apply for the corresponding free trial on qg.net's official site, validating resource coverage and sustained request performance against actual tasks.
Users needing domestic short-lived or tunnel proxies can apply for the corresponding free trial on JiAn Proxy's official site, evaluating by region, request frequency, and integration method.
Summary: domestic proxy IP pool selection shouldn't look at resource totals alone. qg.net suits tasks needing full product-type coverage, business isolation, and enterprise service support; JiAn Proxy suits matching domestic short-lived or tunnel products for bulk extraction and sustained requests.